Everything You Don't Like Is Not "A.I."

As folks know, I am not a fan of generative A.I. for a lot of reasons. The way these programs are trained steals the work from authors and artists in order to swipe money from their pockets. The products are, generally speaking, not up to the quality of paying an actual creator to make something. These programs are swallowing a colossal amount of energy, and burning through a massive amount of water as a result of their widespread use.

However, there is another annoying thing about generative A.I. that I hate... it's become the new insult the Internet is throwing around whenever they see something they just don't like.

The image has how many eyes?

Before we get into the nitty gritty this week, don't forget to sign up for my weekly newsletter to get all my updates right in your inbox. Lastly, to be sure you're following all of my followables, check out my LinkTree!

Lastly, don't forget to check out my Vocal archive for additional fiction, articles, explorations of weird history, and more! And, of course, check me out on Blue Sky, since that's what we're talking about today!

It Just Keeps Happening...

There are always going to be people who criticize the things you make. That's part of the job when you're an artist of any stripe. However, the proliferation of A.I. generators has caused several problems that are tough to deal with in the wild, and they don't seem to be going away any time soon. Namely that people will either assume (or just accuse) you of using A.I. when they don't like you, your work, or both.

For instance, in the recent past I've been accused of:

- Using A.I. programs to generate RPG supplemets (even though they were published before the onset of any generative A.I. programs).

- Using an A.I. text-to-speech generator in my video essays like the one below (it's clearly my own voice, and there are dozens of videos of my speaking right into the camera in the same cadence on the same channel).

- Using A.I. to post on social media platforms due to the sheer volume of posts I make (and while I wish I had a program to do this, no, I have to make a majority of my posts manually. People always seem surprised when I respond).

While this is extremely annoying to deal with, however, I wanted to take a moment to remind folks that this isn't just the inability of many people to tell the difference between A.I. and non-A.I. content. There is definitely some of that going on, absolutely, but there's something far older at the root of so many of these comments.

Put simply, it's just haters using the most recent fad to sling mud at creators. Same as they always have.

How can I be sure of that, you ask? How can I come on the Internet and state with conviction that so many of these comments are not coming from a place of genuine concern, or an opposition to the use of A.I. generators which just so happens to catch human creators in the crossfire?

Two reasons. First, it's always an accusation (typically phrased in a demeaning fashion) rather than a question. Secondly, even if you provide evidence that it isn't A.I. (whether you have a time lapse video of you making something, you can provide the sources for all the items in the project, you have time stamps and publication dates, etc.), the goal posts move. The conversation then morphs into, "Well it looks/sounds like something you'd make with A.I.," or, "Well, if someone wanted [content] like that, they'd just use A.I. instead of paying you for it," and so on, and so forth.

And while this is annoying, and frustrating, and damaging to the calm of all the creators out there still making art with sweat, blood, and spite, I want to say something else that might be a little controversial, but which I feel is important.

Screw the haters. You don't need them to succeed.

You Just Lost Yourself A Customer!

We've all been in those stores where there's a Karen pitching a fit because she didn't get her way, and she storms out with something along the lines of, "I've been shopping here for ten years! You just lost yourself a customer!" But then it turns out that she's bought like one item there in that ten year time span, and most of the time she's just a pain to the staff and to other customers.

This is the box most haters fall into, and it's why you should just ignore them a majority of the time.

So it's agreed. We move on with the day, yes?

It's perfectly legitimate to check your sources to be sure you support creators who match up with your values. And if you don't want to support someone who uses A.I., then you're well within your rights to not do that as a consumer. However, if someone comes out of the gate swinging before they bother to check that what they're seeing is or isn't A.I. (something which can usually be established by a quick check of a sales page, or just asking the creator in question in the comments section), they're probably more interested in the fight than they are in actually finding out whether your project was made using A.I. And if you make it clear you didn't use A.I., but they're still interested in hollering? Yeah... they were never going to support you in the first place. Cut it off now, and save yourself the sanity.

Remember that no matter how cool the thing you made is, and no matter how hard you worked on it, there are some people who just won't bite. They won't watch your videos, won't listen to your podcast, won't buy your books, and won't play your game... and there's nothing you can do to persuade them.

So don't waste time trying... instead, focus on reaching people who will actually become part of your audience, and who do want you to keep making more stuff.

Support The Literary Mercenary

If you want to see me produce more work, consider some of the following options!

- My Facebook

- My Blue Sky

- My LinkTree

- My Weekly Newsletter

- The Azukail Games YouTube Channel (where I contribute video content)

- My Rumble Channel (longer videos that won't show up on YouTube)

And if you happen to have some spare dosh lying around, and you want to be sure my supply doesn't run low, consider become a Patreon patron, or leaving a tip by Buying Me a Ko-Fi!

Also, if you're curious about how to write for tabletop RPGs, don't forget to check out my show Tabletop Mercenary, which you can find on both the Azukail Games channel, as well as my Rumble channel listed above!

Like, Follow, and Come Back Again!

That's all for this week's Business of Writing! For more of my work, check out my Vocal archive, or at My Amazon Author Page where you can find books like my sci-fi dystopian thriller Old Soldiers, the Hardboiled Cat series about a mystery solving Maine Coon in Marked Territory and Painted Cats, my sword and sorcery novel Crier's Knife, or my most recent short story collection The Rejects!

 

And to stay on top of all my latest news and releases, collected once a week, make sure you subscribe to The Literary Mercenary's mailing list. 

The Generative Aspect of A.I. Isn't The Problem... It's The Theft

Since the plagiarism software is still in the headlines (and many tech bros and corporations have attempted to force it to do jobs that it is objectively not capable of doing), I wanted to take this week's update to discuss something that I feel gets either overlooked in a lot of these discussions, or which some people are simply misunderstanding. However, it is not the "generative" part of these programs that's the issue; we've had the ability to do that for years. The problem is the theft, and the absolute lack of morals regarding what these programs are trained on in order to spit out their results.

Moral? Sorry, I thought you said MONEY, that's what I care about.

Before we get into the nitty gritty this week, don't forget to sign up for my weekly newsletter to get all my updates right in your inbox. Lastly, to be sure you're following all of my followables, check out my LinkTree!

Lastly, don't forget to check out my Vocal archive for additional fiction, articles, explorations of weird history, and more!

It's Not What You Make, It's How You Learned To Make It

I first touched on this topic back in A.I. Started With Artists, But It's Coming For Authors, and there are some points I'd like to reiterate from that post. First and foremost, these programs are not intelligence, artificial or otherwise. They're just pattern-recognition software that sucks up data, and spits it back out at you. They're mimics that, more often than not, we anthropomorphisize so that we think they're smarter than they are. To reiterate, this is not a Terminator-style apocalypse; we are dealing with parrot programs that can do nothing except spit out various combinations of what's been put into them.

Which brings us to the second point. The reason people hate these programs is not because they're so much better than creators of all stripes. It's not because they, "allow anyone to make art/write a book," as so many out there claim when they get hate for using these programs. It's because they were fed stolen work to use as the basis for all of their creations. They are, quite literally, the product of theft. It's one of the main reasons the U.S. Copyright Office ruled that A.I. art cannot be copywritten.

Share these? With you? Why would I do that?

There are, for example, programs out there that don't use stolen material to train on, but which still generate results that can be used from what's in their database. For example, I recently talked about The Medieval Fantasy City Generator by Watabou, which is something that I've used for my Sundara: Dawn of a New Age TTRPG setting. I've generated dozens of maps of fantasy cities and towns using the push of a button, and then once I have a map I can fill in the details myself, and breathe life into the project. There have been generators for character names, random writing prompts, and more available for decades, and there are a lot of writers who've made use of those.

The generative aspect of these programs isn't the problem. If you were to take a generator and train it on public domain works like H.P. Lovecraft stories, the works of Edgar Allan Poe, or even paintings from Renaissance masters, no one would have a problem with that. Whether you used the results of these programs as inspiration for your own stories, or just to create cool cover art, you wouldn't be stealing work from anyone. You couldn't copyright anything created with the program, either, but if you're just using it for inspiration (or you don't care about making money) then that wouldn't be an issue.

But that's not how these programs are being used. Instead, businesses and corporations are stealing the work already created by artists, and they're being used to try to rip off those artists, authors, screen writers, etc. A classic example is Jane Friedman, who had to fight Amazon to have books with her name on them that were written by A.I. removed. Because if a business can pay nothing to get the material they're selling, and then make pure profit off of it, they're going to do that. Period. End of story.

So if you're wondering why so many creatives are angry at the proliferation of so-called A.I. programs, examine the source material that they're trained on. Because there are dozens upon dozens of prompts, machines, and engines that can spit out everything from fantasy cities to story prompts, but those which don't use material that was stolen from creatives don't generate any outrage.

When you're taking sides on an issue like this, look at who's on which side of the line. Then ask yourself if tech bros and corporations have ever been the good guys when it comes to situations like this.

Support The Literary Mercenary

If you want to see me produce more work, consider some of the following options!

- My Facebook

- My LinkTree

- My Weekly Newsletter

- The Azukail Games YouTube Channel (where I contribute video content)

- My Rumble Channel (longer videos that won't show up on YouTube)

And if you happen to have some spare dosh lying around, and you want to be sure my supply doesn't run low, consider become a Patreon patron, or leaving a tip by Buying Me a Ko-Fi!

Also, if you're curious about how to write for tabletop RPGs, don't forget to check out my show Tabletop Mercenary, which you can find on both the Azukail Games channel, as well as my Rumble channel listed above!

Like, Follow, and Come Back Again!

That's all for this week's Business of Writing! For more of my work, check out my Vocal archive, or at My Amazon Author Page where you can find books like my sci-fi dystopian thriller Old Soldiers, the Hardboiled Cat series about a mystery solving Maine Coon in Marked Territory and Painted Cats, my sword and sorcery novel Crier's Knife, or my most recent short story collection The Rejects!

 

And to stay on top of all my latest news and releases, collected once a week, make sure you subscribe to The Literary Mercenary's mailing list. 

If you'd like to help support my work, then consider Buying Me A Ko-Fi, or heading over to The Literary Mercenary's Patreon page! Lastly, to keep up with my latest, follow me on Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, and now on Pinterest as well!

A.I. Started With Artists, But It's Coming For Authors

If you've been on social media any time in the past year, you're no doubt aware of the serious situation involving so-called A.I. art generation programs (which will, henceforth, be referred to as plagiarism software). In short, unscrupulous folks have been stealing art, and feeding it into these programs to train them. The computers (who have no real morality) amalgamate all of this art, and then spit out different combinations according to the prompts they're given. Despite the results, and all of the people who herald this as the birth of true artificial intelligence, these are just programs that are sorting and sifting what they've been told, trying to create some chimera out of their data bases that will pass muster.

And while this may have started with art, authors need to get into the trench right alongside illustrators and actors on this one. Because people are already trying to steal our work, and feed it to these bots in an attempt to instantly produce books they can then turn around and sell, regardless of the harm said books may do to authors, or even to those who rely on a text for more than mere entertainment.

Because this is not a fight we want to let corporations win. And they are trying like hell!

Before we get into the nitty gritty this week, don't forget to sign up for my weekly newsletter to get all my updates right in your inbox. Lastly, to be sure you're following all of my followables, check out my LinkTree!

Lastly, don't forget to check out my Vocal archive for additional fiction, articles, explorations of weird history, and more!

What The Hell is Going On!?

This whole crisis is precipitated by a single fact; creators are seen as an obstacle to getting a product by those in charge. It's why studios don't want to pay actors and scriptwriters, it's why companies attempt to pay designers in exposure, it's why YouTube demands you provide them thousands of hours of free content before they'll share ad revenue with you, and it's why a lot of unscrupulous publishers will attempt to cut royalties to the bone all while encouraging writers to keep putting words on the page. Despite the fact that creators are the ones doing all of the work, the idea is always to ask how a company can pay them even less without losing out on the amount of creative work it has to sell to the public.

From that perspective, this software is the answer to their prayers. It allows them to take all the work that exists (if they're willing to completely ignore copyright law, morality, etc.), feed it into a big hopper, push a button, and have the machine spit out a fully complete work on the other side. Best of all, they can then turn around and start selling that machine-created product without paying a single author, or waiting for a living, breathing human being to finish the job.

And it's not just the big wigs who are acting like this is the death knell of authors as a species. Because while tech bros are strutting around like the fox that got the chicken, those who take an inordinate amount of pleasure at kicking down at creatives while simultaneously building their identities around fandoms and properties, have been braying that now we'll all have to, "Go get real jobs."

Unfortunately, the paint is already peeling off this rusting dream of theirs, and the wheels are making a decidedly awful sound as they get ready to come off.

I predict this going up in a fireball any day now.

The reason is, quite simply, plagiarism software isn't intelligence (artificial or otherwise). It is, in fact, rather stupid. All it can do is regurgitate what's been fed to it, and rearrange that information, attempting to predict what order would make it work best. While it might be able to mimic the style of a particular author, it doesn't have the ability to truly plot a novel, make realistic sounding dialogue, or create anything truly new. These programs are great at doing technical tasks (predicting shopping lists, figuring out based on past data whether a given property warrants a remake, etc.), but they aren't some kind of magic button that produces solid-gold novels that will fly off the shelves (despite some people trying this exact tactic, according to CNN).

This is bad enough when it comes to fiction, but as college students have found out, these programs aren't capable of thinking; they just spit out what they think you want to hear. As such, they'll confidently mess up facts, but write it in a way that seems legitimate. This is what makes things like foraging guides produced by chatbots so dangerous... because sure, a company didn't pay an author to write that guide. They're also trusting in an extremely unreliable collection of 1s and 0s to tell people which mushrooms are safe to eat, and which ones will kill them.

A Note on The Troglodytes

Generally speaking, you're supposed to be even-handed with people. You're supposed to try to see things from their perspective, and to try to reach a middle ground. This is particularly true when you are an author, and your brand is just as much about who you are and how you act as it is about the work you create. However, there are a lot of people out there who aren't actually interested in this conversation, nor do they care about how authors, artists, and others are routinely exploited. They just show up in the comments section to jeer, sling mud, and to howl at you to stop whining and pull yourself up by your bootstraps instead of trying to get paid for doing a hobby.

I will not mince words here. These people are troglodytes, and though they've certainly come out of the woodwork thanks to plagiarism software taking center stage, they've always been here. And, in a practical sense, their opinions have always been irrelevant to creators for one, simple reason.

They have never supported us. They have never cared about us. And no matter what you offer them, or how cordial you are, they are no different than the corporate overlords when it comes to exploitation; they just don't bother putting a pleasant face on it.

I'll give you an example that I feel is relevant, here.

As my regular readers know, I write a lot of TTRPG supplements to pay my bills. Whether it's things like my recent release 100 Sci Fi Bands, filled with musicians to set the scene in your cantina, 100 Superstitions For a Fantasy Setting to help you add a little extra detail to your next DND game, or even something like the popular 100 Merchants to Encounter so you aren't scrambling to make up characters at the drop of a hat, this is where the bulk of my earnings comes from.

And holy shit do troglodytes love to accuse me of being a bot!

It happens at least a couple of times a month, but it has shifted and changed over the past year. At first they accused me of building a bot to promote my work, which I'm not tech-savvy enough to do. As these programs have gained popularity, though, they instead claim that I'm just generating lists using this software and tossing them out there, hoping people are stupid enough to buy them. However, when I point out that a lot of my supplements pre-date the existence of these programs, their tune changes, saying that if they wanted a list like this for their game that they would just download a program and hit the button because it's free.

Could you mimic some of my supplements with a chat bot? Probably. As long as it didn't have to keep certain sets of world rules in mind, build balanced magic items, create unique plot hooks, or even maintain proper grammar, I'd say a bot could make a knockoff of the kind of work I do. And for some people, that would be good enough. They'd rather get bot slop for free, than pay a creator even a few dollars.

Because, and I feel this must be stressed, they do not care. If they couldn't get this resource via a plagiarism chat bot, they would attempt to pirate your content so you didn't get paid, or they would start some kind of forum posting war to try and get the community to do as much work on their behalf as possible. These are the same people who will sneer that they're not going to buy your novel because there's so much content available online for free that they don't need you on their to-read pile, or who will loudly demand that you provide free work for them to somehow prove you're a "real" creator.

There is nothing you can do to convince troglodytes to re-examine their biases, and to empathize with creators. What we can do, though, is try to find people who may not understand the issue, and explain to them what's happening. Showing them how a given issue affects all of us, and how the decisions they make can have repercussions, is possible. Winning hearts and minds on this issue is important, since too many folks just don't get a glimpse behind the scenes when it comes to the life of creative professionals.

Have meaningful, useful conversations with you can, but don't bother with the troglodytes. Stay vigilant, stay loud, and don't give up!

Support The Literary Mercenary

For folks who just want to do their part to help keep me making more content, please subscribe/follow me in these locations:

- My Facebook

- My LinkTree

- My Weekly Newsletter

- The Azukail Games YouTube Channel (where I contribute video content)

- My Rumble Channel (longer videos that won't show up on YouTube)

And if you happen to have some spare dosh lying around, and you want to be sure my supply doesn't run low, consider become a Patreon patron, or leaving a tip by Buying Me a Ko-Fi!

Like, Follow, and Come Back Again!

That's all for this week's Craft of Writing! For more of my work, check out my Vocal archive, or at My Amazon Author Page where you can find books like my sci-fi dystopian thriller Old Soldiers, my sword and sorcery novel Crier's Knife, or my most recent short story collection The Rejects!

 

And to stay on top of all my latest news and releases, collected once a week, make sure you subscribe to The Literary Mercenary's mailing list. 

If you'd like to help support my work, then consider Buying Me A Ko-Fi, or heading over to The Literary Mercenary's Patreon page! Lastly, to keep up with my latest, follow me on Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, and now on Pinterest as well!